What Will The New UK Government Do About Seized Dogs: How About, Kill Them All?

As the UK starts to get used to a Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition Government, the country could be forgiven for quickly forgetting the short, sharp burst of activity surrounding the Dangerous Dogs Act in the final days of the Labour regime. A quick refresher: The then Home Sec, Alan Johnson, announced there would be a public consultation in to the issue of dangerous dogs or ‘status’ dogs as they have been alarmingly dubbed. But today, just a matter of hours in to the new term of this, we are told, ‘progressive’ alliance, we learn something so astonishingly shocking about the mindset of those tasked with dealing with the dangerous dogs issue, it really is worthy of wider examination. The Metropolitan Police have been urged to simply kill ALL of the dogs it has seized.

[note]Note: When I initially published this, it was the early hours of the morning. For those people who’ve been asking what can you do (thank you!), please add your voice using the comments section below as it acts as a digital archive of people’s feelings (one that can not be simply deleted or manipulated). But also, please write and express your heartfelt feelings to the newly appointed Home Sec, Theresa May: http://www.tmay.co.uk/contact – these dogs need people to speak up for them at this critical time.[/note]

Long – and possibly recent – term readers to this site will know that the dangerous dogs topic is one of the most widely covered here.

We have long since covered the various debating points and, often hair-brained, proposals as to how we can responsibly and effectively implement laws that don’t attempt to define a dog as ‘dangerous’ based purely on how and what it happens to look like.

The following is from the BBC:

Scotland Yard has been urged to destroy thousands of dangerous dogs rather than paying more than £10m to care for them.

The Metropolitan Police (Met) plans to outsource kennelling and care of dangerous dogs, which could cost up to £10m over four years.

Lord Harris, former Metropolitan Police Authority chairman, asked: “Why don’t we just put them down?”

A record 1,146 dogs, including pit-bull terriers, were seized in London in 2009. Police currently have 451 dogs.

Each dog can cost the force up to £9,000, while owners fight lengthy court cases trying to prevent destruction.

‘Enormous sum’

Lord Harris said the public would be shocked by the cost.

“We seem to be spending an enormous sum of money on keeping weapons for other people. Why do we keep on doing that?” he asked.

The number of dogs held by the police often surges after high profile incidents, such as when children are attacked.

Police said they could complete the paperwork needed to destroy a dog within 72 hours, but court cases can take years to conclude.

Supt Julia Pendry, who is responsible for the Met’s status dogs unit, said the force must operate within the law.

“It would be absolutely fantastic if we could destroy these dogs,” she said.

“Unfortunately it is a criminal offence because the property belongs to other people.

“Secondly, the RSPCA would probably prosecute me, and people like Defra and the national press would have a field day if we started killing dogs that were people’s pets,” she added.

SOURCE

As we have pointed out many times via these pages, the UK tax-payer is currently footing a VERY large bill for the implementation of this failed law.

Has it just dawned on the power’s that be the fact that if we have a law that compels Police to seize dogs that happen to LOOK a certain way, then the costs associated with such idiocy would be massive and they’d be picked up by the tax payer?

It was the Conservatives who brought this law in to force in 1991 and Labour failed to remove it.

In the past 5 years, 6 people have been killed by dog attack.

Breed specific legislation has had absolutely zero impact on reducing the number of deaths or dog attacks – since its inception it is widely acknowledged that the Pit bull type dog is now more desirable and carries a ‘premium’ price PURELY because it is contraband.

If Britain is to be genuinely committed to a reformist, progressive path – may we suggest the idea of wholesale killing of dogs would go some considerable distance to blowing that image clean out of the water.

When China hosted the Olympics, world-wide media levelled considerable criticism at the authorities who ’rounded up’ the stray street dogs and ‘dispensed’ of them in killing chambers.

Just a couple of days in to the UK’s ‘new dawn’ and we have this obscene suggestion that a mass cull of dogs – who are being held BECAUSE they have not been PROVEN to either be of ‘type’ or to have ever acted dangerously. Quick work.

Please, if you are compassionate dog lover – BE outraged. This is every bit worthy of your anger and emotion.

We must rid the UK of breed specific legislation, if not for the clear and obvious animal welfare reasons but quite simply because it does not work, has never worked and is costing us a fortune. If you live in the UK, YOU are paying for these dogs to be held up, often in shocking conditions (MANY dogs die in police care – the numbers are astonishing).

Nobody wants dangerous dogs on the streets. But the solution is to tackle dangerous owners, not dogs that simply happen to look a certain way and fulfil a definition of ‘type’. This is a system that has reached tipping point and we have a clear fork in the road…

we can either:

Seize and seize as many dogs as we have been doing and PAY for keeping them locked up, PAY for them to go through a ludicrous court process where ‘experts’ will argue as to whether their fur is thick enough to be a ‘type’ or if their chest is broad enough, experts with tape measures, experts opposing the experts with tape measures – all the while not even bringing in to consideration whether they dog ACTUALLY DID anything dangerous

or

Seize and seize and arbitrarily kill as many by virtue of the death rate that unfolds with seized dogs in Police ‘care’ or dispense with the charade all together and just put a needle in them as soon as they are seized.

When you think about folks, it really is ONE way or the other.

End BSL now!

Don't forget about Bruce!!

110 Comments

  1. mike jonas May 14, 2010
    • stephen burch May 14, 2010
  2. chelsea May 14, 2010
  3. Girija May 14, 2010
    • Victoria Thomas May 15, 2010
  4. danny kelly May 14, 2010
  5. jayjt May 14, 2010
  6. Lachlan Halley May 14, 2010
  7. Avnish May 14, 2010
  8. Faith May 14, 2010
  9. Michelle Cooper May 14, 2010
  10. Daphne May 14, 2010
  11. Tracy May 14, 2010
  12. chris May 14, 2010
  13. FJF May 14, 2010
  14. Monica May 14, 2010
  15. Nendels May 14, 2010
  16. Hannah May 14, 2010
    • Denise boyd May 14, 2010
  17. samantha espley May 14, 2010
  18. Mandy Rothwell-Billings May 14, 2010
    • Shiela May 14, 2010
      • Ryan O'Meara May 14, 2010
  19. Roxanne May 14, 2010
  20. Gill May 14, 2010
  21. Julie May 14, 2010
  22. Jules May 14, 2010
  23. CAROL RYAN May 14, 2010
  24. Kate May 14, 2010
  25. Tracy Brown May 14, 2010
    • john champion May 14, 2010
  26. Ella Jones May 14, 2010
    • Essjay May 14, 2010
  27. Jacky Cutler May 14, 2010
  28. italykaz May 14, 2010
  29. John Robinson May 14, 2010
  30. Paulken May 14, 2010
  31. dee May 14, 2010
  32. kevin murphy May 14, 2010
  33. Annette Duffy May 14, 2010
  34. Dave Myatt May 14, 2010
  35. Teresa May 14, 2010
  36. tmills May 14, 2010
  37. tmills May 14, 2010
    • kevin murphy May 15, 2010
  38. Susan May 14, 2010
  39. Mary Alice May 14, 2010
  40. Penny May 14, 2010
  41. Julie Steadman May 14, 2010
  42. patricia May 14, 2010
  43. Cathy McCabe May 14, 2010
  44. Denise May 14, 2010
  45. Zach May 14, 2010
  46. Essjay May 14, 2010
  47. Jan Robinson May 14, 2010
  48. valerie May 14, 2010
  49. Nikita Benney May 14, 2010
  50. Jennifer Wall May 14, 2010
  51. rose May 14, 2010
  52. sue May 14, 2010
  53. Rachel May 14, 2010
  54. Trish May 14, 2010
  55. Jennifer May 14, 2010
  56. Kaye Whelpton May 15, 2010
  57. kara May 15, 2010
  58. Doglover May 15, 2010
  59. karen May 15, 2010
  60. Sonja Talboys-Allen May 15, 2010
  61. Anna May 15, 2010
  62. Jess May 15, 2010
  63. Lisbeth Mønsted Larsen May 15, 2010
  64. Victoria Thomas May 15, 2010
  65. Victoria Thomas May 15, 2010
  66. Lisa May 15, 2010
  67. Andrea May 15, 2010
  68. Nur Aykurt May 15, 2010
  69. Vahana Hilke eitner May 15, 2010
  70. Mrs Tina Dukes May 16, 2010
  71. Sakir May 16, 2010
  72. Cris May 16, 2010
  73. Radka May 16, 2010
  74. SDaedalus May 16, 2010
  75. annmarie May 16, 2010
  76. jan May 16, 2010
  77. Leigh May 16, 2010
  78. Lucy May 16, 2010
  79. Karen Clemons May 16, 2010
  80. jayjt May 16, 2010
  81. Fran May 16, 2010
  82. mickey May 17, 2010
  83. Ghostlyease May 17, 2010
  84. Fulvio May 17, 2010
  85. Jackie May 17, 2010
  86. Catherine May 17, 2010
  87. Diane May 17, 2010
  88. Frankie Sunshine May 18, 2010
  89. Frankie Sunshine May 18, 2010
  90. Steve May 19, 2010
  91. charlie May 19, 2010
  92. claire May 20, 2010
  93. jane May 20, 2010
  94. Edward May 21, 2010
  95. Mariya May 25, 2010
  96. jacqueline jewula May 29, 2010
  97. Yvonne Thompson June 2, 2010
    • Yvonne Thompson June 2, 2010
  98. Sara June 29, 2011
  99. Cat July 5, 2011
  100. victor scerri March 2, 2012

Add Comment